Dear All,
Here at the Institute we pride ourselves on keeping the government of the day accountable. Our Policy Review Committee is second to none (although arguably third to quite a number of similar bodies). By applying stringent statistical analysis to election promises and their real world outcomes we have benchmarked world's best practice to the point where total quality control is no longer an issue. So it comes as slight embarrassment to reveal that the head of this august body has actually been dead for the last 18 months. Professor Sydney von Trapp had, in that time, been promoted three times and was mooted as a possible Vice-Chancellor. His protracted silence, which until recently had been admired as canny fence-sitting, was revealed to be advanced putrefaction. The dangers of tenure!
My intention today was to reveal the results of our study into the current government's promise to supply every high school student with a computer. Obviously, our top analyst's rigor mortis (not to be confused with academic rigor, which is an understandable mistake) put paid to such hopes. Fortunately, or to put it another way, fortuitously, a letter chanced across my desk this week from an old friend, the head-mistress of Our Lady of the Reformed Viper School for Girls. I think you will agree that it provides a salutary lesson in the dangers of promises made hastily in the heat of an election campaign.
Dear Sir/Madam (Editor's note: maybe not such a close friend as I believed)
I have retired to the drawing room in the west wing. The east wing has been closed due to an accident with our school computer. You may recall that it was large enough to necessitate the removal of three year ten classes, could calculate the square root of 144 with a week's notice and still have enough memory left over to play a game of Pong. It's much vaunted Chess program was revealed to be a sham. If the computer was losing, a voice simulator would say. "My God! Will you look at that very interesting thing behind you." and then simulate a sneeze that blew all the remaining pieces off the board. Admittedly the large glass valves gave off an attractive glow when operating at full tilt, but the resulting heat killed off 25% of the girls in the class 9G and scorched our priceless collection of Monets painted by Manet.
Subsequently we made a request to the relevant government department for 125 lap-tops. However, a second syllable administrative error resulted in the arrival of a score of chihuahuas, lhasa apsos and shih tzus. Melanie Howitzer, a particularly bright girl in one of the upper forms, has used the dogs in what she calls a canine binary Turing machine. The details are a little sketchy, though the RSPCA are expressing great interest in the results. Maintenance is much easier, involving a number of rolled up newspapers in lieu of an expensive IT department.
This is merely a stopgap measure, though. The bursar is concerned about the level of expenditure on squeaky rubber bones which is 12% higher this financial year. Any advice you can give me on this matter would be greatly appreciated.
Best regards and felicitous salutations
Sister Dulcie Dostoevsky.
Thank you for your time.
Monday, November 16, 2009
Sunday, August 16, 2009
On Office Work
Dear All
Office work (or office-work as it has come to be called in more fashionable sectors of the labour market (or labour-market as it has come to be called in more parlours of the dilettantes and hyphen jockeys)) is perhaps one of the more misunderstood of career choices. In a recent survey of desirability it polled at number 387, positioning it between fluid retainer and Arts Minister of Albania. And yet it boasts a fine history of achievement with a surprising number of dignitaries working in its hallowed halls. Albert Einstein's Uncle Wolfgang, Bertrand Russell's second cousin Ernest and Orson Welle's labrador retriever, Sparky to name but a few. The latter headed up Australia's Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade for 10 years during the Menzies era, a fact which is often forgotten when discussing Australia's primacy in the export of doggie treats and low-angle camera shots during the 1950s.
The dignity of office work derives from a purity of purpose which can only be obtained by the combination of two daily fifteen-minute coffee breaks (or coffee-breaks) and the application of Einstein's General Theory of Relativity to the dimensions of time sheets and office space. Members of the general public fail to discern the Zen aspects of the work, with its concentration on prolonged periods of meditation (with the unfortunate side effect of drastically elongating customer phone call queues) and mindfulness of daily experience, particularly which colleague has stolen the office stapler (or stapler as it is known in the Redundant Zen school of thought and thinking).
While it is well known that Einstein himself worked in a Swiss patent office, few would be aware that a large number of prominent physicists also worked down the hall. Erwin Schrodinger would often lock colleagues in a broom closet with a vial of poison and back issues of National Geographic in an attempt to demonstrate quantum entanglement. He was asked to leave the office after experimenting with a Geiger counter and entanglement with one of the secretaries from the typing pool. Also, Heisenberg worked for a time as a team supervisor but was chronically unable to make firm decisions. Neils Bohr worked on an early draft of his theory of the complementarity while acting as tea-lady. When questioned about his frequent absences from the office he would cite his dual nature whereby he might appear to be in the office or not but could exist in both states at the same time. When observed coming into the office the quantum wave would collapse and he would, indeed, exist in the workplace environment. In the end, his immediate supervisor encouraged him to take early retirement and a Nobel Prize in Physics. The disappearance of the company tea urn, however, have never adequately been explained and this may be part of the reason that Bohrs and Einstein fell out over the years.
In any event, office work has been the metaphorical smithy in which much of modern science has been forged. Lest we forget - many are cold-called, few are chosen.
Thank you for your time.
Office work (or office-work as it has come to be called in more fashionable sectors of the labour market (or labour-market as it has come to be called in more parlours of the dilettantes and hyphen jockeys)) is perhaps one of the more misunderstood of career choices. In a recent survey of desirability it polled at number 387, positioning it between fluid retainer and Arts Minister of Albania. And yet it boasts a fine history of achievement with a surprising number of dignitaries working in its hallowed halls. Albert Einstein's Uncle Wolfgang, Bertrand Russell's second cousin Ernest and Orson Welle's labrador retriever, Sparky to name but a few. The latter headed up Australia's Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade for 10 years during the Menzies era, a fact which is often forgotten when discussing Australia's primacy in the export of doggie treats and low-angle camera shots during the 1950s.
The dignity of office work derives from a purity of purpose which can only be obtained by the combination of two daily fifteen-minute coffee breaks (or coffee-breaks) and the application of Einstein's General Theory of Relativity to the dimensions of time sheets and office space. Members of the general public fail to discern the Zen aspects of the work, with its concentration on prolonged periods of meditation (with the unfortunate side effect of drastically elongating customer phone call queues) and mindfulness of daily experience, particularly which colleague has stolen the office stapler (or stapler as it is known in the Redundant Zen school of thought and thinking).
While it is well known that Einstein himself worked in a Swiss patent office, few would be aware that a large number of prominent physicists also worked down the hall. Erwin Schrodinger would often lock colleagues in a broom closet with a vial of poison and back issues of National Geographic in an attempt to demonstrate quantum entanglement. He was asked to leave the office after experimenting with a Geiger counter and entanglement with one of the secretaries from the typing pool. Also, Heisenberg worked for a time as a team supervisor but was chronically unable to make firm decisions. Neils Bohr worked on an early draft of his theory of the complementarity while acting as tea-lady. When questioned about his frequent absences from the office he would cite his dual nature whereby he might appear to be in the office or not but could exist in both states at the same time. When observed coming into the office the quantum wave would collapse and he would, indeed, exist in the workplace environment. In the end, his immediate supervisor encouraged him to take early retirement and a Nobel Prize in Physics. The disappearance of the company tea urn, however, have never adequately been explained and this may be part of the reason that Bohrs and Einstein fell out over the years.
In any event, office work has been the metaphorical smithy in which much of modern science has been forged. Lest we forget - many are cold-called, few are chosen.
Thank you for your time.
Thursday, July 16, 2009
On Freedom
Dear All
A recent brush with the law has forced me to reflect on the flimsy nature of freedom in this country. I was taken into custody after allowing a guinea fowl to drive me down to the shops for a magazine and a flavoured milk. Apparently I had transgressed some obscure regulation forbidding the operation of heavy machinery by poultry. Fortunately, my attorney managed a plea bargain and my sentence was reduced to the death penalty.
It goes to show, however, that freedom cannot be taken for granted. A salutary example from history - Corporal Lance Heinrichtoffen. He is the only man to have escaped from Stalag XI a total of 476 times. Revisionist historians have belittled his feats by pointing out that he was a guard at the prison and after going home each evening, he returned to his post early the next morning. Such mean-spirited point scoring is the kind of thing we have come to expect from the time-wasters and lickspittles who typically occupy university History faculties in this day and age.
So what is freedom? How do we define such a tenuous concept? Is it just another word for nothing left to lose? And should we even be leaving the discussion of such pivotal concepts to Kris Kristofferson? Or anybody with double initials for that matter? And why so many question marks in this paragraph? What's wrong with the odd exclamation mark!?
Freedom does come at a price though. After all, when Nelson Mandela was released from prison in 1990, he found his coffee shop loyalty cards had expired and a crippling overdue bill for a video he had hired (That Touch of Mink, as it happens) - a debt that South Africa still finds itself trying to address, letters to Cary Grant's agent notwithstanding.
Well, as much as I would love to discuss these matters further, I have a pressing engagement with an Australorp, an iced coffee and a copy of Recidivist Weekly. Now where did I leave those car keys?
Thank you for your time.
A recent brush with the law has forced me to reflect on the flimsy nature of freedom in this country. I was taken into custody after allowing a guinea fowl to drive me down to the shops for a magazine and a flavoured milk. Apparently I had transgressed some obscure regulation forbidding the operation of heavy machinery by poultry. Fortunately, my attorney managed a plea bargain and my sentence was reduced to the death penalty.
It goes to show, however, that freedom cannot be taken for granted. A salutary example from history - Corporal Lance Heinrichtoffen. He is the only man to have escaped from Stalag XI a total of 476 times. Revisionist historians have belittled his feats by pointing out that he was a guard at the prison and after going home each evening, he returned to his post early the next morning. Such mean-spirited point scoring is the kind of thing we have come to expect from the time-wasters and lickspittles who typically occupy university History faculties in this day and age.
So what is freedom? How do we define such a tenuous concept? Is it just another word for nothing left to lose? And should we even be leaving the discussion of such pivotal concepts to Kris Kristofferson? Or anybody with double initials for that matter? And why so many question marks in this paragraph? What's wrong with the odd exclamation mark!?
Freedom does come at a price though. After all, when Nelson Mandela was released from prison in 1990, he found his coffee shop loyalty cards had expired and a crippling overdue bill for a video he had hired (That Touch of Mink, as it happens) - a debt that South Africa still finds itself trying to address, letters to Cary Grant's agent notwithstanding.
Well, as much as I would love to discuss these matters further, I have a pressing engagement with an Australorp, an iced coffee and a copy of Recidivist Weekly. Now where did I leave those car keys?
Thank you for your time.
Monday, June 8, 2009
On the Future of Newspapers
Dear All
Editor of Die Katzemitkartoffelzeitung, Heinrich Muttergottenhammer, once said "Morgen fahre ich mit dem Zug nach Heidelberg." Despite having uttered those words in 1765 he encapsulated the essential dilemma that faces the modern newspaper today. The fact that he was born in 1766 need not bother us here. What is important is that he nailed his colours to the mast, which proved a little inconvenient when he needed to wear them to softball practice.
The newspaper was once the prime purveyor of information to a data hungry populace and major supplier of insulation for avian accommodation. Now it faces a future as uncertain as it is futuristic. It seems a sad demise for a medium which has spanned several centuries of illustrious innovation - from the use of movable type in the 17th century through to the invention of the bingo card in the 20th. What has brought this once proud documenter of the doings of kings and common people, statesmen and servants, plenipotentiaries and podiatrists to its metaphorical knees?
Television delivered the first smack in the kidneys back in the fifties. In a typical assault on the urban tissues, a sock-puppet named 'Sneaky Rochester' read the news on network television in the States while juggling a bag of nectarines. The direct knock-on effect is said to have cost the New York Post 35% of its readership. Such events were indicative of a general shift in mood in newspaper readers. The modern equivalent would be the Fox News Channel. Coincidentally, 'Sneaky Rochester' owns a sizable stake in Fox and has since retired to a luxury deck shoe in Florida.
Of course, nowadays the boogieman is the Internet. The advent of the world wide web is said to be the last nail in the coffin of the urban dailies. In a well-publicised survey, it was found that 56% of Americans got some or all of their information re the 2008 Presidential elections from a website. What is not generally known, however, was that the website was 'Naughty Congress Capers', a hard core pornographic site believed by federal authorities to be a front for a sinister group who share deviant macrame patterns.
In short, the fall of the newspaper has been overstated. As long as a computer screen cannot be folded into a workable pirate hat or rolled to provide a disciplinary tool for micturitionally challenged canines, the newspaper still has a role to play.
Thank you for your time.
Editor of Die Katzemitkartoffelzeitung, Heinrich Muttergottenhammer, once said "Morgen fahre ich mit dem Zug nach Heidelberg." Despite having uttered those words in 1765 he encapsulated the essential dilemma that faces the modern newspaper today. The fact that he was born in 1766 need not bother us here. What is important is that he nailed his colours to the mast, which proved a little inconvenient when he needed to wear them to softball practice.
The newspaper was once the prime purveyor of information to a data hungry populace and major supplier of insulation for avian accommodation. Now it faces a future as uncertain as it is futuristic. It seems a sad demise for a medium which has spanned several centuries of illustrious innovation - from the use of movable type in the 17th century through to the invention of the bingo card in the 20th. What has brought this once proud documenter of the doings of kings and common people, statesmen and servants, plenipotentiaries and podiatrists to its metaphorical knees?
Television delivered the first smack in the kidneys back in the fifties. In a typical assault on the urban tissues, a sock-puppet named 'Sneaky Rochester' read the news on network television in the States while juggling a bag of nectarines. The direct knock-on effect is said to have cost the New York Post 35% of its readership. Such events were indicative of a general shift in mood in newspaper readers. The modern equivalent would be the Fox News Channel. Coincidentally, 'Sneaky Rochester' owns a sizable stake in Fox and has since retired to a luxury deck shoe in Florida.
Of course, nowadays the boogieman is the Internet. The advent of the world wide web is said to be the last nail in the coffin of the urban dailies. In a well-publicised survey, it was found that 56% of Americans got some or all of their information re the 2008 Presidential elections from a website. What is not generally known, however, was that the website was 'Naughty Congress Capers', a hard core pornographic site believed by federal authorities to be a front for a sinister group who share deviant macrame patterns.
In short, the fall of the newspaper has been overstated. As long as a computer screen cannot be folded into a workable pirate hat or rolled to provide a disciplinary tool for micturitionally challenged canines, the newspaper still has a role to play.
Thank you for your time.
Sunday, May 24, 2009
On the Budget
Dear All,
Budget night has come and gone and some colleagues at the Institute have drawn my attention to the need for an analysis that meets the needs of the common man. Not for me the high faluting language of the Economics PhD with the J-curve hanging out of his back pocket and a glint in his eye that says he's going to go co-variant regression on your sorry ass. Or arse as the case may be.
It has indeed fallen to me to translate the rude vernacular of the dismal science into the Queen's English. And from there to translate the Queen's English into a local dialect of Farsi that is more or less user friendly to the man on the street. (Please note I am well aware of the gender discriminatory bias in my language. But let's face it, while the women retire to do the dishes it's down to the guys to break out the port and cigars. Well, at least I would but my wife controls the finances in my house and there's nothing left in the household budget for either strong liquor or carcinogens.)
It helps I think to imagine the Australian economy as a biscuit barrel. Probably a biscuit barrel that is a mite bigger than Auntie Beryl's. We can then think of the Gross Domestic Product (or GDP) as the total number of biscuits in said receptacle(or TNBSR). We can then imagine that the investment in national infrastructure is akin to buying three or four more biscuit barrels. Or at least promising to buy three or more biscuit barrels in the next twenty years or so. Though how we're going to afford to fill those extra containers is a bit beyond me as yet.
The current accounts deficit then is the difference between the number of Tim-Tams currently residing in the sweet pastry filled urn and the number we've promised to donate to the parish fete. Though if it's a deficit then it must be a negative quantity of biscuits. Or cookies if we deal in U.S. currency. If anyone can tell me the current exchange rate of Iced Vo-vos to Oriels I would be eternally grateful (though not in any legally binding or indeed financially debilitating sense). Now a negative quantity of biscuits is not an insurmountable conceptual leap if we invoke quantum mechanics, though I'll leave you to do the heavy shifting re the maths.
The Treasurer then is the local greengrocer who vends said yummy confections. The only difference is that the government minister wears a smarter cut of suit and is more likely to come round to your house and poison the azaleas if he thought there might be a dollar in it.
Hopefully this has clarified the issues. If not, send me a cheque or money order for 25 packets of Milk Arrowroot bikkies and I'll gladly come round for a cup of tea and show you my collection of Burkina Faso zinc roubles.
Thank you for your time
Budget night has come and gone and some colleagues at the Institute have drawn my attention to the need for an analysis that meets the needs of the common man. Not for me the high faluting language of the Economics PhD with the J-curve hanging out of his back pocket and a glint in his eye that says he's going to go co-variant regression on your sorry ass. Or arse as the case may be.
It has indeed fallen to me to translate the rude vernacular of the dismal science into the Queen's English. And from there to translate the Queen's English into a local dialect of Farsi that is more or less user friendly to the man on the street. (Please note I am well aware of the gender discriminatory bias in my language. But let's face it, while the women retire to do the dishes it's down to the guys to break out the port and cigars. Well, at least I would but my wife controls the finances in my house and there's nothing left in the household budget for either strong liquor or carcinogens.)
It helps I think to imagine the Australian economy as a biscuit barrel. Probably a biscuit barrel that is a mite bigger than Auntie Beryl's. We can then think of the Gross Domestic Product (or GDP) as the total number of biscuits in said receptacle(or TNBSR). We can then imagine that the investment in national infrastructure is akin to buying three or four more biscuit barrels. Or at least promising to buy three or more biscuit barrels in the next twenty years or so. Though how we're going to afford to fill those extra containers is a bit beyond me as yet.
The current accounts deficit then is the difference between the number of Tim-Tams currently residing in the sweet pastry filled urn and the number we've promised to donate to the parish fete. Though if it's a deficit then it must be a negative quantity of biscuits. Or cookies if we deal in U.S. currency. If anyone can tell me the current exchange rate of Iced Vo-vos to Oriels I would be eternally grateful (though not in any legally binding or indeed financially debilitating sense). Now a negative quantity of biscuits is not an insurmountable conceptual leap if we invoke quantum mechanics, though I'll leave you to do the heavy shifting re the maths.
The Treasurer then is the local greengrocer who vends said yummy confections. The only difference is that the government minister wears a smarter cut of suit and is more likely to come round to your house and poison the azaleas if he thought there might be a dollar in it.
Hopefully this has clarified the issues. If not, send me a cheque or money order for 25 packets of Milk Arrowroot bikkies and I'll gladly come round for a cup of tea and show you my collection of Burkina Faso zinc roubles.
Thank you for your time
Monday, May 18, 2009
On Immigration
Dear All,
The vexed subject of immigration has once again surfaced in the quality press. In response to growing concern among the gatekeepers of common sense in this country - talk back radio DJs, conservative politicians, guinea pigs with cerebral contusions and agoutis - I have taken it upon myself to conduct a little on the ground research (under the ground research having proven to be a little physically taxing).
My methodology was as breathtaking in its simplicity as it was inaccurate in its deployment. I would speak to the average Australian and glean his views. As luck would have it, the average Australian lives three doors down from me. In order to respect his privacy I will refer to him as Malcom. His wife, Jillian Blanchard Bottleneck, was most insistent on this point due to his position as branch manager working for one of the big four Australian banks (though not the National Australia Bank,Westpac or ANZ).
He proffered the opinion that there were too many queue jumpers in this country. He then proceeded to proffer my knees until I insisted that he stop. I asked him about the government's response to people smuggling and he suggested that it was alright in as far as it went but was deficient in one or two minor aspects. When asked for more detail re these deficiencies, he pointed out the lack of shooting of uranium enriched warheads at arriving boats as one area in which our federal gatekeepers had dropped the proverbial spherical object.
In order to get the other side of the story I decided to interview a typical asylum seeker. In one of those amazing coincidences that makes the laws of chance look decidedly shonky - ha!ha! take that Law of Independent Probabilities - a typical illegal immigrant lived four doors down from me. Literally. He had arranged four doors into some kind of makeshift shelter. So with a spring in my step and a song in my heart (both conditions can be medically treated I am reliably informed though the cardiologist has told me that the latter will require lifetime medication) I arrived at the doorstep of Mr. X. After some confusion about which doorstep I should use he invited me in and then proceeded to lecture me on the corruption and decadence prevalent in the West and how it was impossible to get access to a decent trouser-press these days. He then railed about the baleful influence of the 'Great Satan' in the modern world. In fact, the 'Great Satan' turned out to be Mr. Milson from No. 14 who had borrowed and not yet returned Mr X's leaf blower - an offence punishable by death in his culture. Problematically, possession of a leaf blower was also a capital offense and so my interviewee had found himself ensconced in an ethical dilemma that I was unable to advise him on. I made my excuses and tried to leave quickly through what I thought was the back door but which in fact led to a fracture in the time-space continuum. I was momentarily trapped in an alternative dimension where everything was exactly the same as our world except that barnacles were used as currency.
The experience has affected me deeply and given me a great deal of insight into the intractable nature of this issue. If you'll just excuse me, I'm going to have a little lie down and sort it all out after lunch.
Thank you for your time.
NOTE: It has been brought to my attention that the above comments may have been offensive to agoutis. If this is indeed the case then I apologise unreservedly. At least I apologise to agoutis of the genus Dasyprocta. Members of the genus Myoprocta can, however, go back to whatever backwater of the world they come from and stop stealing Australian jobs.
The vexed subject of immigration has once again surfaced in the quality press. In response to growing concern among the gatekeepers of common sense in this country - talk back radio DJs, conservative politicians, guinea pigs with cerebral contusions and agoutis - I have taken it upon myself to conduct a little on the ground research (under the ground research having proven to be a little physically taxing).
My methodology was as breathtaking in its simplicity as it was inaccurate in its deployment. I would speak to the average Australian and glean his views. As luck would have it, the average Australian lives three doors down from me. In order to respect his privacy I will refer to him as Malcom. His wife, Jillian Blanchard Bottleneck, was most insistent on this point due to his position as branch manager working for one of the big four Australian banks (though not the National Australia Bank,Westpac or ANZ).
He proffered the opinion that there were too many queue jumpers in this country. He then proceeded to proffer my knees until I insisted that he stop. I asked him about the government's response to people smuggling and he suggested that it was alright in as far as it went but was deficient in one or two minor aspects. When asked for more detail re these deficiencies, he pointed out the lack of shooting of uranium enriched warheads at arriving boats as one area in which our federal gatekeepers had dropped the proverbial spherical object.
In order to get the other side of the story I decided to interview a typical asylum seeker. In one of those amazing coincidences that makes the laws of chance look decidedly shonky - ha!ha! take that Law of Independent Probabilities - a typical illegal immigrant lived four doors down from me. Literally. He had arranged four doors into some kind of makeshift shelter. So with a spring in my step and a song in my heart (both conditions can be medically treated I am reliably informed though the cardiologist has told me that the latter will require lifetime medication) I arrived at the doorstep of Mr. X. After some confusion about which doorstep I should use he invited me in and then proceeded to lecture me on the corruption and decadence prevalent in the West and how it was impossible to get access to a decent trouser-press these days. He then railed about the baleful influence of the 'Great Satan' in the modern world. In fact, the 'Great Satan' turned out to be Mr. Milson from No. 14 who had borrowed and not yet returned Mr X's leaf blower - an offence punishable by death in his culture. Problematically, possession of a leaf blower was also a capital offense and so my interviewee had found himself ensconced in an ethical dilemma that I was unable to advise him on. I made my excuses and tried to leave quickly through what I thought was the back door but which in fact led to a fracture in the time-space continuum. I was momentarily trapped in an alternative dimension where everything was exactly the same as our world except that barnacles were used as currency.
The experience has affected me deeply and given me a great deal of insight into the intractable nature of this issue. If you'll just excuse me, I'm going to have a little lie down and sort it all out after lunch.
Thank you for your time.
NOTE: It has been brought to my attention that the above comments may have been offensive to agoutis. If this is indeed the case then I apologise unreservedly. At least I apologise to agoutis of the genus Dasyprocta. Members of the genus Myoprocta can, however, go back to whatever backwater of the world they come from and stop stealing Australian jobs.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)